Extorters have filed bogus claims to the Meta-owned social media platform, then asked for ransoms to withdraw them - knowing repeated claims can lead to account bans.

One Instagram user, who has 1.5 million followers, told the BBC he paid a scammer $50 (£37) to get his account back, claiming Meta's appeal process would take weeks, which had previously cost him thousands in lost income.

"We understand this can be frustrating for those impacted, and our systems are designed to protect people from this happening in the first place," a Meta spokesperson said.

"Following our review, we have restored the affected content and added additional protections to safeguard accounts against further attempts of this kind." However, content creators the BBC has spoken to say Meta is poor at identifying obviously spurious cases, and say its appeals process is slow to respond unless you pay a monthly fee.

'Obviously fake' The Lost in Time History Instagram account posts historical pictures to its more than 1.5 million followers.

Its creator Olly, who did not share his last name, told the BBC he posts pictures in the public domain or where he has permission from the rights holder.

Meta does not check the authenticity of complaints when they are made, so if someone is hit repeatedly, their account can be temporarily taken down.

Olly says he often gets struck for multiple posts at a time, all from the same email address.

He then gets contacted by the person asking to go on to the private messaging app Telegram.

"They'll demand a certain amount of money," he said - usually amounting to a few hundred dollars - to withdraw the claim.

This Instagram post cannot be displayed in your browser.

Please enable Javascript or try a different browser.View original content on Instagram The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Skip instagram postAllow Instagram content?

This article contains content provided by Instagram.

We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies.

You may want to read Meta’s Instagram cookie policy, external and privacy policy, external before accepting.

To view this content choose ‘accept and continue’.

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.End of instagram post Olly ultimately agreed to pay an extorter $50 in cryptocurrency to restore his account, which had been temporarily taken down by Instagram.

Law enforcement organisations tell extortion victims not to pay ransoms as it fuels the criminal ecosystem.

Olly said he paid as a "last resort" because it was quicker than going through Meta, which could take weeks.

"That's the worst part," he said.

"There's no investigation into abuse, or system detection [from Meta] that it could be abuse," he said.

Other Instagram users have shared similar experiences.

"Meta was not helpful throughout the entire process, forcing you to pay for support to talk, even as they claim to be here for the creator," said Abin Tom Sebastian, who is behind the Morbid Kuriosity account.

Meta charges a £9.99 monthly fee to be Verified on Instagram, which gives users 24/7 access to support via a live chat.

"I lost irrecoverable and crucial, brand contracts that unfortunately moved ahead with another creator, and no reassurance or support from Meta saying this will not happen again," Sebastian said.

After the BBC contacted Meta with examples from Olly and other account holders, Meta said it had applied additional protections to their accounts, which it said would prevent similar issues happening in the future.

It said it fought against deceptive behaviour to scam or defraud people and businesses.

All three appear to be based in India, or in countries nearby.

But the BBC has seen messages from one where they ask for $900 (£668) to withdraw a strike.

They claimed this was their payment for the service, and confirmed they kept all the money.

Two others denied they made any money at all.

One said they are sent accounts to target and investigate the claim.

The other said they are sent accounts or posts via an account holder or another representative.

"They're established companies with millions of followers, so it's very different," he said.

Similar strikes have been used against YouTube users too.

But the recent increase in this method may be because AI has made it easier to do this on a larger scale.

"It's a numbers game," Guadamuz told the BBC.

"Pretty much anyone can now deploy [AI] that is going to automate all of this in some way," he said.

Have you been affected by the issues raised in this story?

Let us know Contact form Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends.

Outside the UK?

Sign up here.